I came home tonight and my mother, who is a huge House fan, asked me to tune the television so she could watch her show. It was a marathon so there were a lot of reruns and they were airing the episode where House is treating an intersex boy and there's the whole debacle where the parents are hiding it from him but then it comes out somehow and we have a big expose and generally have a Very Special Lesson to take home from the experience.
I've never actually seen the episode, to tell you the truth. I have no desire to watch this episode. The fact of the matter is I only know about this episode because I read about it through commentary by other people who did watch the episode. The truth is that I feel deeply uncomfortable when shows like House feature people who are like myself in terms of minority status.
Actually, I should be more accurate: I feel deeply uncomfortable when shows like House feature the minority status of people like myself. Fundamentally, when a character comes on one of these shows who is a minority the character itself is never truly the focus nor the point. The character is simply a vessel to showcase whatever makes them "exotic."
This is a form of tokenization and it is inherently dehumanizing not only for the character but for all the people who share the character's master status.
I don't much like that. I don't like something that is part of who I am exposed and put on display for the entertainment and benefit of people who are not like myself. It's just wrong. Even when the shows generally get things right and treat the issue with appropriate deference it feels violating. Fundamentally, placing difference on a pedestal for the benefit of the normative is nothing more than a glorified, modern day freak show.
... and it makes me feel like a freak.
... and the surreptitious glances in my direction to see how I'm responding don't help.
This is not, of course, to suggest that popular media should refrain from portrayals of minority characters. Certainly there are portrayals of minorities where the character is developed and a person in and of themselves. The difference is that they are characters who are minorities rather than just vehicles for 'exotic' characteristics.
~~
I actually feel that this is a large part of why I feel uncomfortable with regards to trans panels and other educational events where people of minority status get together to educate the majority. Too often I feel that these events are ultimately serving the privileged with regards to satiating their curiosity. I honestly do not feel that people are as ignorant as we assume they are and certainly if they had a mind to they could easily do the research to come away with at least the level of education they could ever hope to receive from a half-hour panel. Instead, I feel that the people on display are too often treated as objects of curiosity and, as such, not as individuals.
I've been thinking maybe how we could do better with regards to educational panels and I've been thinking that the best way to do it would be to focus the education not on the people's minority status and their life experience, which seems to be what invariably happens, but on the way that the people of the majority interact with minority persons. I feel that doing this takes away the voyeuristic factor which is so problematic while at the same time centering the discussion on the audience and what they need to do to address our problems.
~~
Anyway, this whole thing is still something that I'm working over in my head so, of course, thoughts if you have them!